Define the examination
Document the authorized sources and the question being examined.
The product is being developed around seven steps that make the path from source material to technical reporting clear.
Parse supported artifacts
Represent source data while retaining original values and references.
Inspect records
Check parsed fields against source-level context.
Compare artifacts
Build timeline and relationship views with clear analytical labels.
Develop focused AI assistance
Planned support for summaries and analytical review.
Review the support
Check significant observations against their supporting records.
Document findings
Record references, methods, interpretation and relevant limitations.
Keep transformations reproducible
Processing versions, settings and transformation steps should be recorded so that an examiner can explain how a structured artifact or timeline view was produced. Generated text remains distinguishable from source records and parser output.
Claude on the roadmap: structured extraction review, source-linked summaries, timeline reasoning, relationship analysis, inconsistency checks and report drafting support.